Hi, it´s nice that you have a look at my website. I would appreciate comments to my articles. I promise to reply as soon as possible.

 

 

 Table of Contents

 Some autobiographical notes Pygmalion, Act III: The Victorian Society
 Educating Rita - not a conventional love story What is Mrs Higgins´ role in Shaw´s play ?
 Educating Rita: An Autobiographical Play Lord of the Flies: Civilization turns into Savagery
The film completed my studies of Educating Rita Golding´s novel contains important issues
From "rags to riches" is no illusion "Melting Pot" or "Salad Bowl" ?
Simon & Garfunkle´s America Who should be allowed to witness executions ?
Tough Problems Call for Tough Solutions Holden Caulfield - a cool teen without any concerns ?
Tom Stoppard´s A Separate Peace: Final Monologue A Cry for Love or A Sex Fantasy ?
Alan Ayckbourn: No time for each other? A Letter to Santa Claus
Agatha Christie: The Queen of Crime Dashiell Hammett´s Continental Op
My own formula of a good crime story Ernest Hemingway A Day´s Wait

 Some autobiographical notes

My name is Silvia and I am 17 years old. I live in Berlin and I am attending the 12th grade of High School.

I have a lot of different hobbies. Writing is one of my hobbies because I like to express my feelings and thoughts in words, so I write a diary, memories and sometimes poems.

I also enjoy reading, some of my favourite books are "The little Prince" written by J.B. Saint-Exupery and "Lord of the Rings" written by J.R. Tolkien. When I read those books I feel like in another world and forget about everything that is happening around me.

Being a member of the School Rowing Team I row every week on the Wannsee, a lake not far from my house. I like being on the water because of the nature and especially the speed you can reach when rowing. Last year our team made a rowing trip for about 5 days!

Another hobby of mine is music. At the age of six I started playing the treble recorder and I participated in a treble recorder choir of the high level for four years. We gave a lot of concerts in churches in Berlin. Six years ago I started playing the piano, which I really enjoy.

Going out with my friends is a ritual every weekend. We go to parks or the theatre and we enjoy exchanging the latest gossip of the week before.

Last year I was an exchange student in the United States of America which was one of my most exciting and challenging experiences of my life. Living in the State of Kansas I had a wonderful host family with three host brothers, 12, 15 and 19 years old.

Getting involved in all the things boys like to do like wrestling and ballgames was quite different than at home where I am an only child. Outside the house we had a big trampoline and a go-cart.

My host family had three pets: a cat called Biscuit, a Collie called Kelly and a Husky called Patches. As you can see, there was always something going on around the house!

Attending DeSoto High School was also a great experience: I got to know another school system with block scheduling, joined the Cross Country team, went to school dances and even participated in the graduation of the Senior Class of 2000! One thing I really liked in the American High School was the relationship between teachers and students: teachers are like friends and it is nothing extraordinary to get invited for dinner by a teacher. This is because a lot of your teachers are also your coaches in sports like cross country, football or wrestling.

I made a lot of great friends during the year who showed me how American teenagers live and what they do at the week-ends. We often went to each other´s houses, had great talks and games, went to the movie theatre or a football game of the Kansas City Chiefs. Once my friends even invited me to go on a vacation to the Lake of the Ozarks in Missouri where we stayed at a cabin and had a great time.

It was a big challenge being by yourself without your parents and friends, speaking another language, but now as it is over it is great to say "I did it!". The whole year taught me a lot, for ex-ample getting to know foreign customs and traditions, gaining a lot of friends and learning how to speak English!

Now, being back in Germany, I will attend High School for two more years and I plan on going to university after graduating from High School.  (Sep 2000)

Back to the top of the page Are you interested in more details ? Ask me.

Educating Rita - not a conventional love story

In my opinion "Education Rita" by Willy Russell is a love story, but not in the way I would normally consider one. For me a real love story is dramatic, deals with broken hearts, committing suicide, hidden love, kissing and is romantic,  like for example "Romeo and Juliet". "Education Rita" doesn´t have a lot of these aspects in it so it is hard to say it is a true love story. On the other hand it is a love story, a story about unfulfilled love.

Frank and Rita trust each other as you can see in different parts of the story. They tell each other a lot about their relationships, their jobs and personal habits. Frank feels something more than friendships for her, for example he tells her that he wishes to take her by hand and run away or he even kisses her when she gives him a little gift from her trip. It is obvious that he likes her because he gets jealous when she wants to go on a trip with other guys from the university and he is waiting impatiently for her to arrive.

Rita also gives him hope that she also wants more than just friendship, she tells him that she likes him and makes him compliments. On the other hand she goes her own way and doesn´t depend on him. She makes her own decisions like changing her job and moving into a flat without telling him.

At the end of the play Frank decides to move to Australia. This decision shows that he realised that Rita would never become his companion and he wants to forget about her and start a new life away from her, the university and his old life.

Back to the top of the page What´s you view ? Tell me !

  Educating Rita: An Autobiographical Play  

Willy Russell wrote his own life story in the play "Educating Rita".  

Willy Russell was born in Liverpool and talked in the same accent as Rita does in the play. He went to school in Knowsley but wasn´t a good student. There were fights going on every day and Willy Russell didn´t care much about reading books, maths or learning at all. He finished school and didn´t have a chance to get out of the way he and his family were living.

When he was at the age to start working his mom suggested to him to become a hairdresser. Willy Russell worked as a hairdresser for a while but was never good at it. He realised that writing would be his favourite thing to do. But now the question appeared where to learn how to write? It was not normal that someone of the working class decided to become a writer so first he wrote some poems and songs during his working time as a hairdresser. After a while he decided to get educated because that would be the only way to break out of the class he was living in. Willy Russell went to an Open University course and started to study English literature. He felt that he found his home and that he had the chance to start his life again.

The story of Rita being a hairdresser and going to an Open University course and not being understood by anyone is the story of  Willy Russell himself, his personal experiences and how he felt when making this decision.

Knowing the background of "Educating Rita" the story gets another dimension to me. It is more interesting to read it when you know that every little thing that is described in the book actually happened to a real person. I understand how hard it is to start all over again and not being understood and supported by your family and friends.

Back to the top of the page What´s you view ? Tell me !

The film version completed my studies of Educating Rita

Normally I don´t like watching a film adaption after reading the book, but this time it was different.

The film and the book "Educating Rita" differ in some details. First of all there is no phone call at the beginning of the film as it is in the book where Julia calls Frank at work to ask when he will be home for din-ner. During the phone call the reader gets to know that Frank is expecting an Open University student to arrive. In the film Julia visits Frank herself and they talk about dinner and Rita.

When Rita arrives you are able to see very well that she has troubles to open the door to Frank's office which is a symbol that it is hard for her to enter into her new life.

During the film Julia has an affair with a family friend which is not de-scribed in the book. She kisses him secretly and it is obvious that she is in love with him and not with Frank anymore. Julia and her new boyfriend hide their feelings from Frank and whenever Frank appears Julias´s boy-friend pretends making a phone call. This element makes these scenes quite funny, especially when Frank comments: "I didn´t pay the bill yet so you can´t be on the phone! " At this moment in the film Julia and Frank break up. In the book their separation is described completely differently. Frank only says: "It was actually caused by something called oefs en cocotte." (page 56, line 22).

There are some more little details which are shown in the film and differ from the book, for example Frank does not kiss Rita to thank her for her gift, then Rita imitates a German soldier and later she meets Denny with his new girlfriend, who is already pregnant, but these little details do not change the story of "Educating Rita" at all.

In my opinion it was really interesting to watch the film after reading the book. It gave me a good impression of what British colleges look like and I got to hear the Liverpudlian accent. Reading or even imitating the accent was quite hard and I could not imagine how it would sound like. I would not have been able to understand Rita in the film without knowing the story before but it was quite interesting and funny listening to her.

Actually I don´t like watching a film after reading a book because it destroys my personal idea of what the persons and the surroundings look like but in this case I didn´t have a strong own idea so watching the film just completed my understanding of "Educating Rita".

Back to the top of the page What´s you view ? Tell me !
The Victorian Sociey as presented in Shaw´s Pygmalion, Act III

In act III of "Pygmalion" the reader gets to know some interesting facts about the Victorian Society with its own traditions and customs.

In the upper class it was usual that everybody got a large living space as you can see at the example of Professor Higgins and his mother. Henry Higgins lives in a three floor house and his mother also has her own big flat in a famous street of London. They both have a housekeeper and several servants and parlormaids. The parlormaid´s job is to let the guests into the house and to announce them to the hostess.

In the Victorian Society the living rooms were furnished by several valuable pieces of furniture like carved chairs and paintings that had already been shown in famous exhibitions like a drawing of a landscape by Cecil Lawson, a famous English artist. It was also a tradition to have a painting of the hostess herself in her youth hanging in the living room. People would have a fireplace and a piano in their house, carpets and a balcony with flowers. The house with its furnishing represented the wealth of each individual family.

To be respected and honoured by the other people of the prosperous slice of society it was a custom to invite each other of the nobility to weekly meetings, which were called "at-homes". Each lady would have her individual at-home day when others would come to her house to visit.

After the arrival of the guests they would greet each other with a formal "How do you do?", but when asking this question they wouldn´t expect an answer and it was considered a misbehavior to answer in detail or to have a pause in between the question and the answer.

When all guests were seated and had a cup of tea the so called small talk could start. The aim of the small talk was not to get informed about the other person´s life or hobbies, but to gossip about others who are not in the room. Favourite subjects were the weather or gossip so the whole small talk was very superficial.

Some strict rules existed as to how to behave at the at-home: being well dressed, having an exquisite language without swearing or slang words, an excellent behavior and no exchange of personal matters. The guests did not stay long because they had several at-homes to go to on one day.

In my opinion the social life in the Victorian Society was a very strict one. Wrong behavior or language, solving problems and talking about personal matters were not encouraged, so people actually did not show how they really were, instead they were acting like living dolls.

Would you like more about the Victorian Era Etiquette? Click here!

Back to the top of the page What´s you view ? Tell me !

What is Mrs Higgins´ role in Shaw´s play ?

She is the only one who is interested in Eliza´s future

In the play "Pygmalion" written by Bernard Shaw Mrs. Higgins is not introduced to the reader right at the beginning. She first appears in the scene when Henry Higgins visits her to tell her that Eliza, his student, is going to take part in her at her at-home day. Mrs. Higgins, of course, is the mother of one of the main characters of the play, Mr. Higgins.  She belongs to the upper class, lives in her own house and has her own house-keeper and servants.

Looking at these facts I would regard her a typical lady of the upper class of the Victorian Society. Mrs. Higgins is respected and honoured by her friends and neighbours and as part of her social obligations she is also hostess of the weekly at-home afternoon at her home including the very superficial small talk.

In my opinion Mrs Higgins takes the typical mother role of the play. This statement is based on different facts; for example, she talks very directly to her son in public, corrects him and tells him what to do and what to leave just like a mother would. In this play she also becomes kind of a mother for Eliza. When Eliza first meets her Mrs. Higgins is very polite and kind to her, she does not treat her not as a common flower girl but as a young lady. Eliza starts to trust Mrs. Higgins. At the end of the play, after the garden party and Eliza´s big test Eliza gets into a fight with Mr. Higgins and decides to leave him. The only place she knows to go to is Mrs. Higgins´ house where she is welcome and, most importantly, supported and understood.

In my opinion Mrs. Higgins is a very important character in the play ,because she is the only one that does not admire her son as all the other people do and the only one that is really interested in what will become of Eliza.

Back to the top of the page What´s you view ? Tell me !

Lord of the Flies: Civilization turns into Savagery

Is Golding´s message that man is basically evil ?

The loss of civilization is one on the main subjects in the novel "Lord of the Flies" written by William Golding. In the story a group of boys land on an uninhabited island and have to survive without the support and help of adults.

In the beginning they still have some items on the island which symbolize civilization, for example there is the shell as well as the fire and the shelters.The shell, which they call conch, symbolizes civilization because it is used to call the group together to have an assembly to discuss and talk things over. The shelters which the boys have built on the island stand for safety. In the night it is much more comfortable to be in the shelter of huts than being outside.The fire is the most important symbol for civilization. First it means giving a signal for rescue and on the other hand it is used very often in civilization: people need a fire to cook food and to be warm. At the beginning the group even make cups out of coconuts to have drinks and they have a lavatory place which is rather civilized.

After a while on this island the group starts breaking off and life becomes bad. Most of the group do not care about the fire anymore which also means that they forget about rescue. Even Jack needs to think one time what rescue means.The group do not care about the assemblies and the lavatory anymore, they slowly lose their civilization.

Jack starts to have another group, a group without any rules, a group that wants to have fun on the island as he calls it. The only thing his group will do is hunt. After a while his group turns out to behave like a tribe of savages. Killing becomes normal to them and they do not make a difference between animals and human beings. They start painting their faces with blood and dance cruel dances around the fire. The loss of civilization is complete.

The final scene in Peter Brook´s film (1963)

The members of the original group start to join Jack´s group, so after Piggy is killed Ralph finally is on his own. He is the only one who wants the fire to keep burning but does not get support of the others. The group of Jack is not able anymore to decide between good and evil, evil has taken hold of them.

Back to the top of the page What´s you view ? Tell me !

Golding´s novel contains important issues

In this novel "Lord of the Flies", written by William Golding in 1954, a group of boys land on an uninhabited tropical island. They live on their own without any adults and have to deal with daily conflicts, fear and the decreasing hope of getting rescued. After a while the group breaks up into different interest groups and evil increases every day. One of the main issues described in the book is leadership, which still is an important issue of today. Already at the beginning of the book the boys decide to run an election by acclaim to elect a leader. A leader is necessary to have, a person that is in charge of everything."Seems to me we ought to have a leader to decide things" is an important statement of Ralph that turns the story in to a significant direction.

The fight for power between Jack and Ralph is a typical issue that apperars in everyone´s life, everbody already had to deal with this kind of fight and always will. The same as Ralph and Jack would like to be chief and have power, everybody wants to. Leadership, election and the fight for power are issues of today. The chief in a family, the fight for power between brother and sister, all the elections that are run in the world represent the issue of power and leadership. Having power and being the leader is a very responsible job. It can be used in different ways, one of those ways is able to support other people, a country or company, the other one is able to destroy everything. Both ways were already used in history. The leadership of Hitler destroyed a lot and had a country lose respect and power. The opposite way, the way of support, had a lot of companies have success.

In the novel"Lord of the Flies" both ways appear. First everything is fine, Ralph who was elected leader, decides things to have a better life on the island, he calls meetings and builds shelters for the night. Jack´s fight for power is the only problem. Jack starts having a group of hunters and he starts painting his face with blood. Things are breaking up. Nobody follows the rules anymore and Ralph realizes that he does not have too much power anymore. In his statement " What are we, humans, animals, savages?" it becomes clear that everything on the island turned into another direction. Jack becomes more and more a leader and a lot of people start to follow his rules. Jack has won the fight for power. Situations like this happen everyday. Envy controls people. When somebody is leader there always is someone else that wants to be in the same position. Looking at this fact I would consider leadership and the fight for power an important issue of today.

Another issue of today that is described in the book is the issue of losing civilisation. In the novel "Lord of the Flies" people are losing civilisation and do certain things they normally would not do, things that are not allowed in our society. First it starts slowly, for example when a boy is throwing stones at others. He would not do this under normal circumstances, but on the island normal circumstances are far away. The loss of civilisation becomes bigger and bigger, especially when the one big group splits up in two other groups. One is led by Jack, the other one by Ralph. In the end they even start killing human beings that have been their frieds before. The evil of mankind makes the boys hostages of themselves.

In today´s society the loss of civilisation is an issue, too. An example would be the conflicts between to cultures that happen all over the world. People forget that they are humans. Hate makes people wild, turns them to be evil. This hate is connected with envy as it is described in the the novel. Jack hates Ralph quite a lot and this hate is based on envy that he himself did not become chief. The same basically happens in today´s society. In the news you can sometimes hear about a murder in the family or one of the siblings for example believes that the other one has more rights so it gets so mad that it kills its own brother or sister.

In my view the fight for power and leadership, and the loss of civilisation are unfornately important issues of today It happens all over the world and everybody has to deal with them. In my opinion William Golding presents certain issues of today quite well and looking a this fact the book is interesting to read.

Back to the top of the page What´s you view ? Tell me !

From "rag to riches" is no illusion

People who cause problems are lazy and do not want to change their situation

dream2.jpg (16835 Byte)

What does the American Dream actually stand for? In my opinion it stands for being able to get rich when working hard, often called from "rags to riches". There are many different definitions of the American Deam, but which one is the right one? I think that everybody has a different idea what the American Dream means.

In my opinion the American Dream is something positive. Everybody can get ahead if he is willing to give something for it, such as time, spirit and work. There are so many examples of people who have made their way up from rags to riches by working hard. Of course there are many negative statistics about homeless children, drug abuse, unsafe parks and city streets because of criminality but these are problems every country has to deal with and cannot remove because the people who cause these problems are not willing to work or are trying to get out of their situation. In my opinion these people are lazy and actually do not want to change their situation, try to get ahead, earn money and start a better life.

But to me the question still remains why the American Dream is called American Dream. Why is it not called Everybody´s Dream or European Dream? Probably this question can be answered as follows: when poverty and hunger ruled in Europe a lot of people emigrated to America because they heard of farmland and more job possibilities. I think the ideology of the American Dream originates from that time. During that time a lot of families had the chance to get ahead and have better life in America than in Europe. The idea of the American Dream has been carried on from that time to today and will be carried on into the future.

In my conclusion it is good that people believe in the American Dream because if you have nothing to believe in and no aim to reach you will not have the energy to work hard and get ahead. So the American Dream motivates many people to put energy in their life and at least try to achieve something.

"Melting Pot" or "Salad Bowl"?

Today the topic of "America - a multicultural society" is omnipresent in the media. The two symbols "Melting Pot" and "Salad Bowl" are often used and now the question arises to me, why these two notions are actually used to describe the two varieties of American multiculturalism.

As everyone well knows a melting pot is a vessel and inside of it iron and other raw material get melted and in the end there is equal liquid in the vessel. The expression used in today’s media does not refer to the vessel for iron, but for people that come from many different nations and all live peacefully together in the same area.

In the late 19th century and in the early 20th century many different nationalities immigrated into the USA and the idea of the "Melting Pot" developed. In the "Melting Pot" there are no specific areas for each individual nationality, they all mix, share the same schools, offices and parks. A good example of a city where a "Melting Pot" existed was turn-of-the-century New York. All immigrants had cultural similarities, because most of them were originally from Europe.

The exact opposite of the "Melting Pot" is the idea of the so-called "Salad Bowl". "Salad Bowl Cities" developed in the late 20th century and a good example of such a city is Los Angeles today. In a salad bowl as we know from the kitchen you can still identify all the ingredients after mixing cucumbers and tomatoes etc. The same actually applies to the "Salad Bowl City", also called "Mosaic City", because in these cities people from different nations do not mix. They all have their individual schools, buildings, offices and parks. The specific areas of each nation are called "towns" such as the "China Town". In China town in Washington D.C. the houses are even built like in China.

The reason why the ethnic groups, who have come from all over the world, do not mix are frictions between their cultures such as ethnic pride and ethnic competition.

In my opinion people should try hard to build up communities with the idea of the "Melting Pot" in mind, because I think that the exchange of the individual customs and traditions of the nations will support the multiculturalism in America. The "Salad Bowl" just causes hate and competition between them. On the other hand I also believe that each ethnic group should still have the chance to live their own way of life, but this should also be possible in the "Melting Pot".

Back to the top of the page What´s you view ? Tell me !


Simon & Garfunkle´s America

sim_garfunk2.gif (4464 Byte)

(Photo: 1999)

 

America

by

Simon & Garfunkle

  
"Let us be lovers we´ll marry our fortunes together"
"I´ve got some real estate here in my bag"
So we bought a pack of cigarettes and Mrs. Wagner pies.
And we walked off to look for America.
  
"Kathy" I said as we boarded a Greyhound in Pittburgh
"Michigan seems like a dream to me now"
It took me four days to hitchhike from Saginaw
I´ve gone to look for America.
  
Laughing on the bus,
Playing games with the faces.
She said the man in the gabardine suit was a spy.
I said "Be careful his bowtie is really a camera."
  
"Toss me a cigarette, I think there is one in my raincoat"
"We smoked the last one an hour ago"
So I looked at the scenery, she read her magazine.
And the moon rose over an open field.
  
"Kathy I´m lost", I said,
So I knew she was sleeping.
I´m empty and aching and I don´t know why.
Counting the cars on the New Jersey Turnpike.
  
They´ve all gone to look for America
All gone to look for America
All gone to look for America.
Simon and Garfunkel wrote their song "America" in the late 1960s. It has five verses and within each four lines. In the first verse a couple decides to leave their home to look for a better life and to live their individual American Dream. They do not prepare their trip in detail, they only buy some cigarettes and pies. Looking at the second line "I have got some real estate here in my bag" I assume that the narrator is very poor and does not own anything valuable like a car or a house because this line is meant sarcastically and ironically. The last line in verse one says: "And we walked off to look for America."  This statement tells the reader they are on their personal way to look for a better future.

In the second verse it becomes clear which way they chose to travel. They bought two tickets for a greyhound bus leaving in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Traveling with the Greyhound bus company in the USA is much cheaper than going by plane. This information lets the reader be sure that they do not have enough money to take a plane which would be much more comfortable. Another fact is that passengers in the Greyhound bus are able to get in and out whenever they would like so they do not have to have a specific destination before. Looking at this fact shows that they do not have any plans for their future. The statement "Michigan seems like a dream to me now" gives me the impression that their old life in Saginaw, Michigan, has already become unrealistic.

In the third verse they are on the bus, laughing and being in a good mood, probably because they have made the first step forward and live part of their American Dream. They make games with the faces and imagine what the background the passengers might have.

In the fourth verse they stop playing and because they have smoked all their cigarettes the man looks at the scenery and she reads her magazine. In line four the reader can see that they have already been in the bus a long time because the moon already rises. He realizes that it will take a long time to find his American Dream.

In the fifth verse it becomes clear that the narrator is scared because he does not know what is future is going to be like. Because they count cars on the highway you can see that they are not alone on their journey.

The song "America" was written in the Hippie generation. During that time a lot of teens ran away from home seeking a better life. The song has an open end and with its melancholic music each individual listener can finish the story of Kathy and the narrator himself.
Back to the top of the page What´s you view ? Tell me !

Who should be allowed to witness executions ?

Mass murderer McVeigh wants his execution to be televised

live_tv.gif (15328 Byte)

The emails I read in an internet forum express different views about the attraction of executions in the media. Some of the authors are in favor of live coverage and others think it is irresponsible. Some of the arguments and statements are quite convincing, so the obvious question arises which opinion is right. To start with I am not able to make a decision on this subject which recently has often been discussed in the media.

The author of one email seems to be in favor of broadcasting capital punishment on television. He says that since it is his money and taxes that are used for the execution he does deserve to see what it is being used for. He thinks that if people saw the true nature of the process of execution they would oppose it. I personally think he is right because people - assuming they are reasonable adults - can see the difference if it is acted in a film or brutal reality. If they saw the cruel process of capital punishment and a person dying, people would probably take the initiative and do something against it and it would become a bigger deal in the U.S.A. than it is right now, because U.S. citizens worry more about taxes than the death penalty.
Another participant in the forum says that showing a live execution would not reduce the incidence of capital punishment, it would even increase the incidence of it. He also makes the very important point that showing a live execution on TV would desensitize the impressionable youth. I also think that teenagers and children are not able to distinguish between seeing a person dying in a horror movie or in the execution room. Several cases have already happened where especially young boys under 12 watched a horror movie and afterwards tried to imitate the scene and accidentally killed each other. But on the other hand if live executions are not allowed on TV why should horror movies be allowed?

Of course, I have never seen a live execution, but I watched a movie called "The Green Mile" where a black person got executed and it looked cruel and real and I think there is not much difference between a movie and reality, only that reality often is not as brutal as a film.

Would a life execution not disappoint the people that watch it? Watching a lethal injection is like seeing somebody go to sleep. There are no blood, screams and brutality and this might be disappointing given the blood-lust of the typical television viewer. As the author of one email says the ratings would be higher if we reverted to more dramatic forms of capital punishments like beheadings for example.

An important argument is given by another person, who says that in former times people brought their children and picnic baskets to public beheadings and this would obviously happen again. Probably the family would sit in front of the TV in the living room and watch executions like we watch the TV show Big Brother. If this happened executions would lose their sense and killing a human life would be as normal as going to school. Commercial companies would take their chance and before an execution there would probably be an advertisement for chocolate or cars and this is just wrong and even perverse.

As a conclusion I am against the broadcasting of executions, but I still think that the family of the murderer or the victims should be allowed to watch the execution. From a psychological view it might release the pain of the families of the victims and they would finally find a closure of this sad chapter of their life.

Back to the top of the page What´s you view ? Tell me !

Tough Problems Call for Tough Solutions
Where is the key to the real management of crime?

In today´s media the question is often asked what the real key to the management of crime is. To start with, in my opinion there is not only one key, there are several keys to decrease the crime rate.
One of the most important keys is the death penalty. Statistics show that in states where capital punishment is allowed the crime rate decreased during the past years. The death penalty is a successful key to prevent people from killing other people.
Of course, there are several groups and organizations that are completely against capital punishment for many reasons. They say that nobody got the right to kill someone and that God forgives all the sins people have and that the death penalty is not the right way to fight against murder. On the one hand I agree that we should not kill people at all. But on the other hand the people that lost all their respect for another human being do not deserve to live. There are people who killed people in such brutal and cruel ways as first raping young girls, then stabbing them in the neck and in the end they hang them-still alive- upside down on a tree to die. I think this is enough not to feel sorry for them. The victim´s families often cannot wait to "see the ass of the murderer fried". It gives them relief and they can probably close this horrible chapter of their life.

deathpenalty.jpg (7129 Byte)

Furthermore a person that killed once often kills again after they get out of prison. It is a fact, if a criminal gets life imprisonment he will get out after several years because of good conduct and the whole thing starts over again.
In my opinion another key to the management of crime could be life imprisonment with very hard work, for example carrying bricks and stones in mines for the rest of their life. They should be treated without any respect. I think this is even worse than dying on the electric chair or with the painless lethal injection.

As you can see I cannot decide which one the real key is to the management of crime. I think that any key is acceptable that decreases the crime rate.

Back to the top of the page What´s you view ? Tell me !

Holden Caulfield - a cool teenager without any concerns ?

Since J.D. Salinger´s protagonist in "The Catcher in the Rye", Holden Caulfield, takes it very easy that he got expelled from Pencey Prep the question appears if there is anything he really cares about. To answer this question I will look at some passages in the book in which I think he might show some feelings.
A good example is when his roommate Stradlater tells him that he has a date named Jane Gallagher, who is an old friend of Holden. They used to live next to each other and played checkers all the time. The phrase "boy, I nearly dropped dead when he said that" shows that he is really excited to hear from her. He is reminded of many things of his and her childhood. Their mothers belonged to the same golfing club so they got to meet each other quite often. I think that Holden is very surprised to hear from an old friend again. Another statement of Holden is "I kept thinking of her and Stradlater having a date and all and I nearly went crazy". Looking at this statement it occurs to me that Holden is probably rather jealous. He does not like the idea of Stradlater spending time with her because he is "just a sexy bastard".
Holden is also quite sensitive and caring. This is not only shown when he thinks about Jane but also when he invites Ackley to go to the cinema on Saturday night. Ackley lives in the room next door to him and is a strange person that always squeezes his pimples. When Holden waits for him to get ready he opens the window and since it is December it snows already. He forms a snowball but does not throw it at anything even if he is tempted to do so. The fact that he does not do so is that everything outside looks so nice and friendly.
One of the most interesting passages to read to find out if he has any feelings is when Holden talks about his dead brother Allie. He describes him in a loving, caring and admiring way. "He was fifty times as intelligent" or "He was the nicest member in the family". The night Allie died Holden broke all the garage windows just to hurt himself. This reaction shows how desperate and helpless he was. It was hard for him to accept that he lost a person that meant a lot to him. The story and the way Holden tells it show what a caring heart he has. He does not use any slang words as he usually does, which makes this passage special.
The way Holden talks about his feelings is different, as we would expect it to be. As Holden himself admits "I never discuss my personal life", he also is reluctant to show his feelings.

Back to the top of the page What´s you view ? Tell me !

Tom Stoppard´s A Separate Peace": Final monologue

"How does she know what´s good for me? How can Maggie actually say a sentence like this? How does she even dare to? Of course, people always think they know every single detail about a person even without knowing any background information about this special person. They often even do not know their names, the same as the doctor and the matron and the whole hospital do not know my name. Well, a name does not say a lot, but they actually do not know ANYTHING about me. They can only guess. But why for Christ sake do they WANT to know every single detail about me? They ask where I am from, if I have a family, where I am occupied, what my age is? Why can the not just respect me? I am a well paying person. They should like me because of my money - isn´t that typical of society today?
They are thinking about me all day. I do not do any harm to anybody, why do they not just leave me alone and just serve me the food? I want a peaceful atmosphere, do nothing, good food and just enjoy myself. That would be just great, that would be good for me. But they invited my family over because they think that this will be good for me. I do not want to see them. I have not seen them for years. All I want is to sit in bed doing nothing. They don´t seem to understand.

When I look back at my time in prison camp right after the war I can truly say that this was the best time of my life. Nobody of the officers cared why I was there, I just existed. Why can this not work here the same? In camp I got my food regularly, I had tons of time for myself and nobody interrupted me asking if I want to make some paper flowers. They seemed to know what was good for me. I did not have to do anything all day long. Nobody understood why I did not escape from prison like the other 19 soldiers. Why should I have escaped from this paradise? This would have been the last thing I would have done. Afterwards people told me that escaping was an order of the army. Well, it might have been good for them. They do not enjoy doing nothing all day. People always have to be busy. All the nonsense, they told me about escaping from prison would be an honor. Honor is just for people that want to show off. I do not want to show off, all I want is to enjoy life as long as I can determine how it goes.

I think Maggie agrees with me. At least she accepted my way of life and did not force me to make paper flowers of basket weaving. She let me paint English countryside on the wall for her. She liked it. But she still does not know what is best for me because she invited my family over. I think people always draw a parallel between themselves and other persons. What is best for them is also best for all the rest of the world. For Maggie her family coming over might have been the best for her.

Well, I cannot change her. I think I will just leave this hospital to look for another place where I am served, have a nice atmosphere and where I am able to do nothing all day. This is the only thing that is best for me!"

Back to the top of the page What´s you view ? Tell me !

A cry for love or a sex fantasy?

When Flora is confronted with the matchseller in the play " A Slight Ache" by Harold Pinter the reader learns more about Edward´s wife. First she talks about the weather and beats about the bush until she ends up talking about a very intimate and personal subject, about herself being raped when she was younger. Of course, the the question arises why she trusts the matchseller so much, even when she accuses him of being the rapist. Flora´s intention to talk like this is either a cry for love or a sex fantasy.

We know from the beginning of the play that Flora's and Edward's marriage is not the best one because the main point in their marriage is not love but the never- ending "battle for positions", which is exemplified by their argument if wasps either bite or sting. Looking at the state of her partnership her "cry for love" is most understable. Flora wants to be loved and because Edward neglects her she desires someone else. She even assumes that the matchseller only waited for her to come. Another indication of her despair is that she really cares about the matchseller´s well-being when she offers him a "lovely lathery bath"; she also wants to be loved in return.

There are still other hints that her intention is a "sex fantasy". Due to her unfulfilled and unsatisfying marriage she might not have had sex for a long time and seeks for a situation to be close to a man. There are many reasons to justify this interpretation:

pinter4a.jpg (10859 Byte)
Flora approaches the matchseller
(source: http://www.utc.edu/~theadept/
)

First Flora talks her being raped, maybe to "introduce" this subject to the matchseller. Afterwards she is sitting on the arm of his chair asking him questions about his sex-life: if he likes women and if he ever "stopped a woman" and in the end she tells him to speak about love. She even starts throwing her arm around him, opening his jacket and calling him a "solid boy". If her intention had only been a "cry for love" she would merely have talked to him about her problems, but because she even gets close to him and touches him I think she is so frustrated in her marriage that she starts fantasizing about sex.
Back to the top of the page What´s you view ? Tell me !

A Letter to Santa Claus

Message from Santa Claus: "I am sorry, but after endless patience I have come to the conclusion that after 2001 mankind has finally forfeited the right to celebrate Christmas."

Dear Santa Claus,
in your message you announced that after 2001 mankind has finally forfeited the right to celebrate Christmas. In my opinion we still deserve Christmas because of different reasons.
Of course, in 2001 many cruel things happened in the world. The most shocking example is the terrorist attack in the U.S.A. when two kidnapped airplanes crashed into the World Trade Center in New York City on September 11th. Thousands of innocent people died in the collapsing towers, hundreds of firemen and helpers died when they tried to save human life. We should never forget this cruel and brutal day which will change the life of everyone. On the one hand one could say that celebrating Christmas only two and a half months later is not right or even perverse but on the other hand it is very important for the bereaved families to have a calm and quiet time and to pray for peace and relief. It would be no help to them to change the tradition and to cancel Christmas, it is more important to keep life going. Also Christmas time can be seen as a relaxing, peaceful and pleasant time for those people who are faced with the political problems in the Afghanistan conflict. They might even find solutions when they are able to relax with their family.
In the business world of today people are forced to live far away from each other and therefore many families are separated. Christmas is a getting together of the families, which is quite important. Of course they are actually able to visit any time of the year, but Christmas is a special time of the year with a special atmosphere, an atmosphere of love.
Another point to think about is that Christmas actually lost its original meaning. When we celebrate Christmas we actually celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ. This meaning does not seem to be important anymore and might be another reason for you, Santa Claus, to say that mankind does not deserve to celebrate Christmas anymore. But, dear Santa, remember that time has changed and even you yourself are an invention by Coca Cola! Especially in the U.S.A. Christmas is a big deal, Americans celebrate this time to an extreme extent: there are Christmas decorations all over the place and they put up the tree in the middle of November and put empty boxes around it and when you enter a shopping mall you meet at least 10 people dressed up as Santa Claus.
During Christmas time people are excited and especially to the children Christmas is often the highlight of the year. They prepare gifts for the entire family, bake cookies, write their wishes to you, Santa, and sneak into their parents´ bedroom to look for their presents. Do you want to destroy their excitement? I do not think so.
Of course, it is not fair to celebrate Christmas when people in other parts of the world have to be afraid of bombs, when they have to leave their hometowns because of war or have to starve. Thinking about this situation in other parts of the world makes people lose the joy of Christmas. But in this moment they want to help because Christmas is a time of giving. Around Christmas time many people spend money or items to help helpless people. In many churches there are so called "Angel Trees", which are Christmas trees but instead of the decorations there are notes attached to them with wishes of children who live in orphanages. People can take these notes and buy the gifts for those children. I think this is another reason why we deserve Christmas because in no other time of the year people are so willing to give.
Dear Santa Claus, what would you actually do without Christmas? You would lose your job and only sit on a white cloud with your empty reindeer sleigh and watch people having no Christmas. That would be sad, wouldn´t it? And if mankind had forfeited the right to celebrate Christmas after 2001, do we deserve to celebrate birthdays or Easter or should we rather live a life without any joy?
Because of these reasons I ask you not to cancel Christmas.
I hope to see you next year.
Yours Silvia
Back to the top of the page What´s you view ? Tell me !

Agatha Christie: The Queen of Crime

agachristie2.jpg (3156 Byte)

Agatha Christie is the world´s best-known mystery writer. Agatha Christie wrote 79 novels, short stories and detective stories, her best-known characters are Miss Marple and Hercule Poirot. Her books have sold over a billion copies in the English language and another billion in over 45 foreign languages - she is outsold only by the Bible and Shakespeare.

Of course there is the question of the secret of Agatha Christie and her success.

First her books can be read by everyone, by a 12-year-old schoolchild or an 80-year-old grandmother. The characters in her book are always familiar characters chosen from the upper middle class of the 1930s. The lifestyle of her characters is often undermined by financial problems, which lead to murder. The murder itself is non-threatening because the actual violence of the murder rarely appears in her plays. This is a reason why also younger teenagers are fascinated by her stories because they do not become afraid of them.

In Agatha Christie's detective stories the reader gets a fair chance to solve the case, because the clues are not hidden. The plots are clever and tricky but never above people's heads. There is always a close circle of suspects in Agatha Christie´s detective stories, but often the reader is fooled to suspect an innocent character. Agatha Christie is also popular among women, because she clearly places women at least eqal to men. Many of her settings are of a time and a place, often mid-century English villages that have a romantic attraction.

In my opinion these are the main reasons for the success of Agatha Christie.
Back to the top of the page What´s you view ? Tell me !

Dashiell Hammett´s Continental Op

The private detective and Sherlock Holmes have a lot in common

The narrator in the story "The Main Death", written by Dashiell Hammett, is the private detective himself. From this special point of view the reader gets to know important characteristics of the detective.

First of all the detective talks in a "detective-slang" for example "I want the low-down in the Main doing" meaning that he wants the main facts of Main´s case. His language shows that he is a professional detective who knows his job quite well.

In the story he is the one who collects the clues and tries to find out who robbed Mr Main and killed him. He cooperates with Hackney and Begg, two other detectives from the police, which is a thing that detectives normally do not like. They rather work alone. Another difference to the traditional detective stories is that Hammett´s private detective works for money, usually the Great Detectives of the past such as Sherlock Holmes did not get paid for their job.

The private detective is always friendly to the people he has to talk to, for example when he talks to Mr Gungen, the jewelry dealer, who ordered Mr Main to show a very expensing tiara to a costumer in California. Apparently Mr Gungen is a shady person as the private detective describes him. He might be a dealer who sells stolen goods. The private detective knows how to get the information he needs because he tries to be very kind to Mr Gungen, for example when he pretends to agree with him when he talks about the relationship between men and women. The private detective is also able to connect the clues he gets from the people he interviews. When he is talking to Mr Gungen about Rose and asks him who she is he finds out quite quickly that she is friends with other criminals but he does not tell these facts to Mr Gungen.

The private detective cooperates with other police detectives but, nevertheless, he is the captain in the team. He orders Hacken and Begg to go and search for other clues and to shadow people who might be involved in the crime. He knows how to be respected, but also treats his partners with respect.

When the private detective talks to Mrs Main he already knows that she is involved in the crime. He asks her why she made up the robbery story, but already knows the answer himself: because of the insurance. This shows that he knows human thinking and acting quite well and that he is clever to connect this and what he already knows about the case.

As a conclusion I think that the character of the private detective in this story is similar to the character of the Great Detectives such as Sherlock Holmes. They know a lot about the case and know how to solve it. They are convinced that there is nobody better than they are and because of this they rather work alone than cooperate even though they do cooperate. In the end of the story they have solved the case and tell their solution.

Back to the top of the page What´s you view ? Tell me !