The tale
The Sheep In Wolf´s Clothing by James Thurber deals with two sheep that want
to go among the wolves as spies to see what wolf life is like. After a day in Wolfland,
they believe that every day in Wolfsland is like they have seen, namely that the wolves
aren´t that dangerous, but just like the sheep. Both sheep want to write a book to
publish their experiences but hide it from each other. Both of them compete to publish
their text first. So they don´t investigate the real situation well enough and give a
message to the other sheep that turns out to be wrong. For the sheep are suddenly attacked
by the wolves, after they removed all protection. So the sheep are wiped out because of
the futile competition of the two sheep.
This tale is a typical fable. It contains speaking and acting animals. The figures in the
fable represent people in real life. In this case the two sheep stand for the aggressive
journalism in our society. It often happens that journalists nowadays do not care if they
have not examined their information carefully enough, but only want to achieve to publish
their story first. This can cause that many people get injured. But this result does not
matter to the journalists. Another characteristic of a fable is the moral that it
contains. The moral of this fable is: Don´t get it right, just get it written. So it is
aimed at the journalists. I guess that the meaning of the moral is actually the opposite,
for the author uses sarcasm. What he really wants to express is a criticism of the
behaviour of those journalists. Probably the moral he wants to say is: To prevent bad
results, you have to get it right, not just written.
(X.C., 11d, Dec. 2006)
The fable "The sheep in wolf`s clothing" is about two
sheep who dressed up like wolves to spy out Wolfland. After spying out Wolfland both of
them wrote that wolves were like sheep and every sheep in Sheepland trusted them. So one
day the wolves came to kill every sheep and no sheep reacted because they were not afraid
anymore. Those two sheep had betrayed their friends and families, because they only wanted
to make money with their stories. And because of this desire they did not think about any
consequences. They only got it written, but they did not care if it was the truth, that is
what the moral at the end of the fable means.
It is typical of a fable that there animals can speak and act, that it ends with a moral
and everything is full of imagination but with a realistic background as if the actors
were human. In a way those two sheep killed the others because of this big deception and
maybe they were like wolves, not only dressed up like them.
I think that there are many similarities between the `sheep journalism` and our current
journalism, because the main thing is making money and therefore journalists have to work
faster, harder without looking for quality, because the most important aspect is the
number of sold newspapers. (L.D., 11d, Dec 2006)
In the modern fable called The Sheep in Wolfs
Clothing by James Thurber two sheep disguise as wolves one day long and join the
wolves society. Incidentally this day is a fete day, so all wolves are nice and seem
to be peaceful. Because the silly sheep think that this is the every-day-life
attitude of them, they want to sell this information in their country by writing a
book. After a real competition between both sheep who would break this news earlier, one
of the sheep sells it to a newspaper. When the other sheep read this (false) news they
believe the author and do not pay attention anymore, so the harmless wolves
attack and kill all the sheep.
The moral which Thurber wrote under the story is not to care about true facts
but only to write something. In my opinion this is ironical, because it is absolutely the
opposite of the real moral: The fable shows the way many journalists and newspapers are
working. They are not informed very well, for example, they only rely on one source, and
so they sometimes publicize things which are totally wrong. The fable also shows possible
consequences for the readers (in an extreme way, of course). If we are influenced by such
bad newspapers it can lead to dramatic consequences for us. The moral could be: Dont
get it written, if you dont get it right! (L.H., 11d, Dec 2006)
|